Citez cateva fragmente care mie mi-au placut foarte mult:
despre rolul presei nationale scrise si al culturii de elita in promovarea discursului violent anti-minoritar, anti-multiculturalist, anti-modern si xenofob, p.22-23:
One of the dangers that aggravates and extends the extremist danger in Romania is the increasingly systematic manifestation of an anti-minority, anti-modern discourse in the national written press, and even of highbrow culture, with an increased capacity to penetrate in the circle of educated citizens, newspaper readers, of students and of the social elite. This discourse is not inciting, but its confusion and distortions, aggressive tone, apocalyptic style, reductionism and/or the accusatory note feed a cultural space that spawns right-wing extremist ideologies.despre Patapievici, p. 25:
The person who made the anti-minority, homophobe and anti-multiculturalist attitude into a wide cultural success was Horia-R. Patapievici. Patapievici's theses oppose the 'traditional' and the 'modern' man to the more recent modernity, under the threat of political correctness, multiculturalism and pro-minority policies.Despre tendintele extremiste ale bisericii ortodoxe romane, p.41:
The extremist tendencies within BOR follow the historical line of its support of legionnarism between the two world wars. On the one hand, legionnarism self-defined itself as a Christian-Orthodox movement, and the legionary ritual borrowed the cult for the death, the exercise of fasting and of praying. On the other hand, priests and Orthodox hierarchy were an important support for legionnarism [...].Foarte tare.
